Suggestion Saturday: December 25, 2010

Merry Christmas to those who are celebrating it today and happy <holiday of your choice> to everyone else! Here is this week’s list of blog posts, comic strips, photos, videos and other tidbits from my favourite corners of the web.

How to Make Friends in Brooklyn. We need something like this in every community!

A Candy Quiz from 1945. I wonder how many of these facts apply to candy made in the present day?

How to Discuss Gay Rights. This illustrates why I tend to steer a few thousand miles clear of certain topics until I’ve known someone for a certain amount of time. I can’t say for sure whether this is a good or bad thing. On the one hand I do feel morally obligated to push back against bigotry and ignorance wherever it may sprout. On the other hand there comes a point when people need to take responsibility for their own education on matters in which they don’t have any personal experience. Rake me over the coals for this if you must but I refuse to spoon-feed anyone. 😉

The Twelve Days of Christmas. A Biblical version of this traditional carol.

On Elf Work. A blog post about how gender roles affect what some women do this time of year. It makes me glad I don’t celebrate Christmas or (more importantly!) have a significant other who thinks that gender has anything to do with keeping in touch with extended family. Some people thrive in a relationship with these types of gender roles/expectations but I’m not one of them.

Dixonian Future Animals of Brussels. Here are some absolutely enthralling pictures of hypothetical future animals. I wish I could be around to see how close this models come to the truth in a few million years.

This comic speaks the truth: we will never really know what is going on inside the minds of everyone else and it doesn’t do any good to assume the worst in others. It is something I’ve worked hard to understand in 2010 and will keep gnawing on throughout 2011.

What have you been reading?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorised

Non-Theistic Morality

“With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
—  Steven Weinberg

Last week I blogged about a sermon series about the problem of pain and how Bruxy Cavey approaches this question. During his second podcast Bruxy briefly mentioned his beliefs about the origin of human morality. In short, he believes that it comes from God and that there cannot be a just system of morality without God behind it. He says:

Atheists cannot explain their own morality.

While he absolutely agrees that atheists can be just as moral or good as Christians he doesn’t think that this sense of right and wrong can come from a non-theistic worldview:

they [atheists] are far more moral than their worldview accounts for

because he believes that there must be a higher power that arbitrates between various human groups for the greatest good. While I respect Bruxy Cavey immensely as a speaker and as a fellow human being I vehemently disagree with this premise.

For one, religion doesn’t make people more moral or good. The rules – whatever they may be – are broken just as often by the people who believe in them as they are by those who don’t follow that particular religion (or none at all.)

Sometimes, in fact, the act of following the rules actually seems to make good people into much less admirable versions of themselves. I’ve known more than one individual who was a wonderful friend and human being in every way other than his or her religious beliefs. When the topic of God came up it was like a switch had been flipped in that individual’s brain and they lost much of the good that I saw in them the rest of the time. Rather than seeing the rest of us as friends or fellow human beings we became  unrepentant sinners, unbelievers, potential converts or, worse, social projects.

Bruxy and I also have a fundamental disagreement about where our desire to do and be good comes from.

I believe it comes from our generations upon generations of experiences as an extremely social species. With the exception of the rare hermit or mystic we do not do well in a life of solitude. We need one another and so we have learned ways of getting along in difficult situations and of strengthening our bonds with one another.

In short, I believe we (tend to) share similar beliefs about what is fundamentally a good or bad thing to do to someone else because cooperation and altruism are some of our oldest social tools. We could not have survived and become what we are today without them.

In a roundabout way this leads me to today’s question:

What Does Non-Theistic Morality Look Like?

That is, how do people who don’t believe in God decide what is right and wrong? How do we determine what it means to live a good life?

I believe much of it boils down to harm. Do my actions hurt me or someone else, intentionally or unintentionally? If they do I probably shouldn’t be doing them in most situations.

This is a deceptively simple “rule.”  Many aspects of modern business and product marketing  would not pass it because of all of the suffering that is caused when:

  • People are consumers before anything else
  • Workers (especially the working poor) are treated like machines
  • Money is used to define our worth as human beings

My ethical beliefs and morals don’t come with a long list of rules. Almost everything that I puzzle over can be reduced to the question of harm.

I also believe in being and doing good for goodness’ sake! That is, I (try to) lead an ethical life not for any sort of eternal or extrinsic reward but because it’s the right thing to do. Of course I hope that other people will treat me with kindness and respect in return but no one is keeping score here. I’d continue to be as loving, forgiving and kind as possible even if one or several or many people around me were none of these things. (If it continued, though, I’d find a new social group. 😉 )

Respond

What criteria do you use to decide what the most ethical or moral choices are for your life? Why are you good?

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised

Exercise for People Who Hate Exercise

Growing up I dreaded gym class. I disliked being told how to exercise or feeling sweaty when I walked to my next class and I really disliked how competitive and repetitive the sports were that we played.

In the sixth grade I had a particularly troubling series of physical education experiences. Between Christmas and the end of the school year I sprained a finger at gym class once or twice each month. No sooner had one finger more or less healed than another would be sprained which meant that I spent four or five months living with at least one swollen, bruised, and resistant-to-being-bent finger almost all of the time. The memories of those months made me less interested in organized athletics than ever before. As an adult, though, I realize that exercising is part of staying healthy.

Some people genuinely enjoy the camaraderie of team sports and  the thrill of competition. Unfortunately I’m not one of them. If I try to keep up with activities that I dread doing I’m not going to have the motivation to continue with them. One of my challenges in 2010 and looking forward to 2011, then, is to find a variety of activities that I enjoy enough to come back to tomorrow, next month, and next year.

Here is my brainstormed list of activities so far. I’ve divided them into two categories: indoor and outdoor.

Indoor

  • Take the stairs instead of waiting for the elevator
  • Walk up or down the escalator
  • Heavy duty cleaning around the house
  • Knead bread, mash potatoes, mix dough, etc. by hand
  • Assist neighbours with heavy lifting or awkward household chores
  • Swim (can be an outdoor activity in the summer)
  • Borrow fitness books from the library
  • Search internet for free workout video clips
  • Free activities: pushups, sit-ups, jumping rope, jumping jacks and squats
  • Cheap(ish) activities: bowling, roller skating

Outdoor

  • Gardening (I hope to have the space for this soon!)
  • Jogging
  • Brisk walks
  • Snow creativity – building snowmen, snow forts, snow monsters.
  • Going on a hike or camping trip (although not during the winter)
  • Bicycling, canoeing, ice skating

Respond

How do you stay active? What non-traditional forms of exercise do you participate in? Can you recommend any other inexpensive, indoor forms of exercise for the winter months? (It’s so much easier to stay active when it’s nice outside!)

14 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised

Suggestion Saturday: December 18, 2010

Here is this week’s list of blog posts, photos, quotes, poetry, comics, videos and other tidbits from my favourite corners of the web. (Photo credit.)

Life In 3 Panels

Glee Meets Dr. Dre. Imagine if a glee club decided to to sing a Dr. Dre rap song. This is not a work-safe video and I don’t recommend it for those who are easily offended by profanity. Everyone else – this is a fantastic example of how reframing a song can expose (and poke fun of) misogyny.

Monticello Slave Chefs. This video discusses how James Hemings, one of Thomas Jefferson’s slaves, earned his freedom by learning how to cook French cuisine at a time  when everything was cooked over an open fire. I’d never realized before how much work it was a few hundred years ago to make even a simple meal!

Life Hacks. My favourite tip was the one that teaches you how to make an elevator zoom straight to your destination. It doesn’t seem like a nice thing to do to those who pressed buttons for other floors, though.

Holding Hands. Ack, I feel emotionally claustrophobic just reading this. 😀

Participating in a Miracle. A new twitter friend, Cathryn (StoryRoute), shares her first experience helping an ewe with a difficult labor. I had previously assumed that only humans had the occasional breech birth.  (The photos do document the birth but none of them are graphic.)

This is Kind of Genius. The problem with being female online. It’s funny because it is too often true (although I have seen an improvement over the last few years…or maybe I’ve just drifted into less sexist social circles?)

A final thought:

Mistakes are a part of being human. Appreciate your mistakes for what they are: precious life lessons that can only be learned the hard way. Unless it’s a fatal mistake, which, at least, others can learn from.

– Al Franken

What have you been reading?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorised

God and Explaining Suffering

Last month I listened to the podcast of a sermon series about the problem of pain called My God Why? in which head pastor of The Meeting House, Bruxy Cavey, attempts to answer the question:

Why would a loving God allow there to be so much suffering in the world?

Bruxy’s first sermon on this topic boiled down into one sentence:

We can’t know for sure on this side of eternity but take comfort in the knowledge that God suffers alongside us. The links at the beginning of this provide a great deal more detail and nuance to his argument, of course. If you only have time to listen to one podcast in this series I recommend the first one and if you happen to listen to the third instalment, The Origin of Evil, I highly recommend checking out Drew’s response to Bruxy’s theory on the origin of evil. I was actually planning to write a very similar blog post about that part of the series here but Drew nailed every point I had compiled in my head!

What I like about Bruxy’s sermon and the idea of a God who suffers alongside with us:

  • People who are suffering are not blamed for their misfortunes.
  • A suffering God seem more human and far less distant than the other versions of God I’ve been introduced to in the past.
  • Bruxy acknowledges that there will always be a new question behind the one that has just been answered.
  • Bruxy affirms the idea that we see things through a glass dimly on this side of eternity. I appreciate his honesty here.

These are my disagreements or issues with this answer:

  • The idea of a God who suffers with us doesn’t actually alleviate anyone’s suffering.
  • Suffering yourself and allowing someone else to suffer are two completely different actions.
  • If God suffers with us wouldn’t that give him or her even more of an incentive to intervene? I know that I’m far more apt to work to solve a problem if it’s physically or emotionally painful for me.
  • How could a deity who created the entire universe not be able to think of an alternative way to encourage people to worship and embrace him or her that doesn’t involve billions of lifetimes of often unrelenting suffering? Surely he or she could think of something!

To be fair, this is an incredibly difficult question and Bruxy’s answer is best one I’ve ever heard from a theistic point of view. It also avoid many of the often unbelievable offensive assumptions made by or trite phrases embedded in traditional Judeo-Christian responses to this question:

  • God has a plan!
  • Suffering is a divine pop quiz.
  • You’re suffering because of a past un-repented sin.
  • You’re suffering because your parents or grandparents have un-repented sin.
  • If your faith was stronger you and your loved ones wouldn’t have these problems.

Unfortunately something is still lacking in this explanation. Or at least it is for me.

Imagine  if a storyteller began to quietly share a new tale of adventure over a roaring fire late at night. Just as the hero or heroine gasped one last breath before his or her seemingly grisly, unavoidable death the storyteller says “and then somehow it all worked out in the end and everybody lived happily ever after. The end. Who wants another marshmallow?”

Bruxy’s explanation sounds a little like this to me. It begins in one place, veers off in a completely different direction and then ends abruptly. I want to find solace it but it has too many rough edges.

A blog post isn’t enough space to figure this all out, of course. Honestly, a lifetime isn’t even long enough. There are other explanations out there, though, which is the other half of what I’d like to discuss today.

Alternative Explanations

Sh*t happens. You can make all of the right decisions, take every known precaution and still end up being diagnosed with an incurable disease or die in an accident tomorrow. There are no guarantees in this life, no magic elixirs to protect your loved ones from harm. This also means that no one deserves everything that happens to them. Tragedies to triumphs, some things we earn, others are given to us, and others show up out of nowhere. The problem with this explanation is that, at least for me, this  doesn’t provide any hope that tomorrow will be any better.

God doesn’t exist. This isn’t actually something I believe but it does account to a certain degree for the randomness in which fates are doled out. If there’s no one working behind the scenes it makes more sense for selfish, wicked people to prosper as much if not more than those who are kind and giving.

God exists but isn’t involved. At times I do believe this one. One of the benefits of being Agnostic is that I don’t have to claim anything as the capital-T Truth. When I do lean toward the idea that God exists it makes far more sense for God to be uninvolved  in the affairs of his or her creation than it does for God to love us, have both the knowledge of intense suffering and the ability to end it and yet still do nothing to alleviate it. This (apparent?) lack of action is something that disturbs me to the marrow of my bones.

None of this is real. Another theory: we’re living in the matrix. Everything we think we’ve experienced has been a simulation, a computer program of sorts. I’ll admit that it is one of the wackier theories out there but there is a certain allure to it. If nothing else it’s an intriguing metaphor for how we interact with this thing called existence.

What do you think?

13 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised

Suggestion Saturday: December 11, 2010

Here is this week’s list of blog posts, gobs of poetry-related stuff, comics,  photos and other tidbits from my favourite corners of the web.

The Fig Tree. A poem about the self-esteem of a tree. It sounds like the sort of thing I’d write. (Photo credit.)

Mr. Ray. The life and death of a man in Calcutta.The portion I’m linking to is actually the fourth instalment of his story. (There are links to first three sections at the top of the page.)

Even If… Anyone who knows me well would agree that I’m uninterested in traditional romantic stuff. I’d much rather be the recipient (or giver) of everyday, practical whispers of affection instead of flashy, one-time declarations or gestures. Yet I adore this poem.

Be Nice and You’ll Be Rewarded. On catching the most (metaphorical) flies. The first three-quarters of this piece make it sound as if the author advocates being nice so that people will give you free or less expensive stuff. This isn’t what she is actually saying, though. Read a little further on. 🙂

from Written on the Bones:

One thing I might say to someone who can’t relate to poetry is: You don’t have to love all poetry. Do you love all music? Do you love every piece of art you see? Find just one poem you love, and speak it out loud. Your body, feelings, voice, and thoughts will come into harmony when you speak a poem that matters to you, and that can be incredibly healing.

Mesmereyezing Magic Worm. This photo is pure silliness but it did remind me how I’ve never been able to see the hidden images in those technicolored optical illusion photos that were so popular in the 90s. (Yes, the misspelling in this entry is intentional. It’s also a pun which is one of my favourite types of jokes.)

The Dinner Party for Everyone. Now this is a vision of God and the afterlife in which I could believe!

What have you been reading?

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised

The Anatomy of Innocence

Before we dive into the meat of this post there are a few stories you should know.

1986. Lake Erie. A study in personalities: my newly-mobile baby brother, Jesse, tries to crawl into the middle of the lake. I stand before the largest body of water I’ve ever seen and ask where the drain is and how and when it will be pulled. I wonder, but do not ask, where the drained water will go, how loud it will gurgle and how long it will take to refill the lake tomorrow morning.

1995. Ohio. I’m 7/10th a little girl. For now. Every Sunday after church I absorb Xena: Warrior Princess in my newly-decorated, mint-green bedroom, still adjusting to these things called cable television and puberty. The ripple of Xena’s muscles as she fights off the bad guys and her connection with Gabrielle nudges something deep inside of me that I won’t noun for years to come.

The Difference Between Men and Women

In the 1990s I heard the same story about sexuality over and over again at church, in abstinence-only sex education classes at public school, and from the mouths of about a dozen different special speakers overtly and covertly at assemblies and special church functions over the years:

As a young woman it is your job to monitor how you dress, act and behave so that men don’t become too distracted around you. Men aren’t like women. They have needs.

Once I heard a speaker, one of the few women who I ever saw speak in front of a large church group, acknowledge that men needed to be careful not to play around with the emotions of women. That, apparently, was our achilles heel.

As a Christian, especially as a Christian who was also female and a preacher’s kid, I wasn’t suppose to think about sex. Even being attracted to other people was morally dubious. I never did figure out how to avoid that.

Not only did I have sexual thoughts and feelings…only some of them were about the opposite sex. In a culture that said gay or lesbian in hushed tones (and bisexual not even once), in a world in which everyone knew that these things were caused by mothers who loved their sons too much and fathers who loved their daughters too little I had a lot of stuff to figure out.

The pieces I’d collected didn’t fit together. I’d always had a father who adored his kids, who would do anything to protect and provide for them and I couldn’t wedge into the sharp corners of straight any more than I could into the term lesbian.

How can I carry your bag when I already have my own?

As each youth group rally, sex ed class and special speaker layered their ideas about gender roles and sexuality on top of one another the question of carrying two bags weighed more and more heavily on my mind. Even before I knew how my puzzle fit together I thought it was insane to ask me – or any other teenage girl –  to assume responsibility for someone else’s sexuality. Carrying our own was work enough. I didn’t know how to carry two and had no interest in trying.

No one else I knew was asking these questions and if they had their own puzzles pieces to sort out I never caught a glimpse of them. In these ways I felt anything but innocent.

Over time, a very long time, I began to sort out the pieces. There was always a part of me that felt worldly for having these tasks, though. It wasn’t that I was ashamed so much as it was that I didn’t know how to reconcile my life. Asking a metric ton of tough questions was one thing. Bisexuality was another. But I didn’t know how either of these could or should intersect with my spirituality.

I know this is a long post. I have one more story for you.

Toronto. 2009. In the middle of a conversation during a big project a coworker turns to me, tilts his head and says “you’re so good, Lydia.” I’d adjectived myself many times before then. Good was one of the slipperiest modifiers of them all. Between my jumbled up puzzle and the Calvinistic undertones of my (former) faith it felt weird as hell to use that word to describe anyone other than God.

What is innocence? What is worldly?

I don’t know any longer. Those aren’t even the right questions to be asking. All I know is that I’m me. You are you. There is nothing else either of us can be.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorised

Green Washed

By far the strangest phenomenon I’ve encountered while living in the big city is the unholy wedding of environmentalism and consumerism.

Last year a law was passed requiring businesses to charge their customers at least five cents for every plastic shopping bag. In response to this law, more and more businesses are selling reusable plastic and cloth bags so that people who don’t want to pay the fee or accumulate more plastic bags have another option while shopping.

Some of the bags are black and plain, others are covered with bright colours and whimsical animal, plant or geometric patterns. Grocery stores often sell incredibly sturdy reusable bags that have the store’s name printed on the side of them. There is one style of bag that has various phrases printed on the side of it. For example, it may say this is a green bag or this is not a plastic bag.

Snide phrases like these irk me.

The Irks

  • I’ve never heard of any these bags (or the companies that make and/or sell them) extolling the idea of buying and consuming less as a permanent lifestyle change.
  • Unnecessary purchases are not made one whit more necessary by the type of bag in which one carries them home.
  • Sermonizing does nothing to endear other people to one’s cause.
  • Ethically speaking, it seems so strange for one to purposefully draw attention to his or her own virtue. It is far better, IMO, to let your actions speak for themselves.

Other Examples

This is only one example of the melding of environmentalism and consumerism. Back when Drew and I still had cable our local news channel would occassionally feature stories in which the host talked about various ways of living a more green life.

In many cases, this involved buying new stuff that had been grown or produced in more eco-friendly ways: appliances, homes, cars, clothing, toys, shoes. Anything that could be repackaged as earth-friendly was repackaged as such and much of it was far more expensive than what one would typically pay for such a thing.

Are organic, locally grown/made, fair-trade products better? In many cases yes. At other times I’m less sure. I do feel a twinge of guilt when I buy something that was probably picked, sewn or assembled by someone working for abysmally small wages in dangerous conditions.

Sometimes there are no alternatives, though, or the conscious-friendly option isn’t even in the same solar system as my budget. This is what I do instead:

  • Use it up.
  • Wear it out.
  • Give away what I no longer need.
  • Gratefully accept what others pass along to me.
  • Only purchase the absolute necessities.

For certain items I’ll also consider buying used although the North American bedbug epidemic makes me wary about bringing home anything in which they could hitch a ride. A set of dishes, cookware or cutlery would be acceptable things to pick up at a secondhand store or garage sale; an upholstered couch, on the other hand,  is something I’d insist upon buying new. 😉

8 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised

Suggestion Saturday: December 4, 2010

Here is this week’s list of blog posts, videos, photos, comics and other tidbits from my favourite corners of the web.

Candy Making 2010. Last month I pestered….er, encouraged my friend Teresa to blog about her experiences making homemade candy. After reading her post I’m unbearably curious to see if I could whip up some dairy-free versions of them one day when I have a bigger kitchen!

Strip Searches and Blaming the Terrorists. The funniest comic I’ve seen  yet about the TSA and highly invasive search techniques.

Walking to Nowhere. The problem with evaluating neighbourhoods based on how easily one can walk to, say, the grocery store or post office is that it does not take into account something very important. Click on the link for more information!

Wild. This comic alludes to a novel’s worth of questions. Why is she standing alone, (tastefully PG) nude in the woods in the middle of the night? At what are her wolves howling?

Unlikely Prophets. What is the first thing you think of when you come across someone who displays bizarre behaviour? I thought I was the only one who responded in a certain way but the author of this post has the same reaction to this!

From A Little Selfishness Never Killed Anyone:

Selfishness is not a negative term unless we make it out to be. If you call someone selfish, they will automatically take it as an insult. Why? There is nothing wrong with being selfish if it is done properly and if you don’t trample on others in the process. Really.

Finding Wildness. There is an amazing video of starlings flying in the evening sky at the end of this post that I’ve watched over and over again.

What have you been reading?

9 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised

Zombies, Altruism and the End of the World

By far my favourite new TV series this year is The Walking Dead, a post-apolyptic zombie tale based on a series of comics by the same name.

I’ve always enjoyed the heart-pounding excitement of horror and end-of-the-world stories.Gore or violence don’t makes these things worth watching but how the characters react to what is happening and how they come together to fight it (or occasionally lose all social cohesion and don’t do anything at all.)

What If?

There’s something to be said for wondering if a bump in the night is an indication of something other than just a strange sound, for being prepared for the worst even as one fully expects nothing at all or only good things to be waiting around the corner.

When we go out to eat my Dad has always preferred to be seated at a corner booth where he can sit and observe everyone who walks past us. To the best of my knowledge he’s never been harmed in any way while eating out. 😉 He simply prefers to know his surroundings and to never be caught unaware.

There’s also something to be said for facing the ugly truth within each of us. Scary movies and tv shows can and often do portray painfully sexist, racist, homophobic, and classist views. This is not a good place for those who want to believe that we live in a world in which these things no longer taint how people perceive one another. Things are improving, yes, but prejudice and discrimination aren’t going away any time soon.

If the economic, social and national ties that bind us together were unwoven and people had to fend for themselves (or die trying) the world that the survivors re-created would still be birthed out of all of our old assumptions. In this I cannot disagree with the creators of The Walking Dead and similar shows.

The Walking Dead, like most post-apocalyptic tales,  assumes that this new world would be quickly overtaken by sociopaths.

This is Where We Disagree

I understand why someone would assume that a post-apocolyptic world would heavily favour our most selfish tendencies. In a world full of limited resources it would make a certain kind of sense to battle over them in the short term. An individual who goes to bed with a full stomach every night, after all, is going to have that much easier of a time remaining healthy and strong.

Altruism is a better strategy for long-term survival, though. Eventually even the strongest person is going to need help with something: setting a broken limb, having a baby (and at least occasional assistance in looking after him or her for at least the next dozen years), solving a problem, building a home, fixing a broken tool. No one remains young, healthy and independent forever.

It is in these moments that relationships win out. Someone with a history of altruism is much more likely to find the advice and practical help that they needed. Would some selfish or sociopathic people survive? Of course. There will always be those among us who eschew social mores and try to get something for nothing.

I don’t agree, though, that they would define who we are as a species any more than they define us now. Every day I see people looking out for one another in gestures as small as opening a door or offering a subway seat to someone who needs it more to as monumental as a stranger risking his own life to save another. There is so much good in this world, in each of us. (If you don’t believe me, click here.)

Even with our prejudices and deep imperfections people are good. There would undoubtably be conflicts in an emergency situation like the one portrayed in The Walking Dead but I do not, I cannot believe that our future would defined by the grim.

11 Comments

Filed under Uncategorised