Hosted by That Artsy Reader Girl
This is one of those topics I could write dozens of blog posts about and still come up with more answers to it. I only write reviews of a portion of the books I read.
Due to this, I decided to share the reasons why I don’t write reviews of certain books I loved.
1. The series had an unexpected ending
Example: Jean M. Auel’s Clan of the Cave Bear series
I loved the first few books in this prehistoric world. The last few instalments didn’t tie things up the ways I thought they would based on the early foreshadowing.
While I understood some of the changes the author made, I don’t think I’m the right person to review this series because of how different my interpretation of those early scenes was from the author’s interpretation of them.
2. It’s a classic novel
Example: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
Frankenstein is one of my all-time favourite classics! If we ever get another Frankenstein film, I will be shouting that news from the rooftops and blogging a (hopefully glowing) review of it.
With that being said, this story is 202 years old. Most people who want to read it have already read it, so I’d rather save space for newer books that aren’t so well known.
3. Mainstream audiences have embraced it
Example: Andy Weir’s The Martian
Now don’t get me wrong! I love it when people who don’t normally read science fiction discover something in this genre that appeals to them. It has made me extraordinarily happy to see this interest of mine become much more mainstream since I was a kid, and I welcome every new fan.
But I also feel compelled to focus on lesser-known science fiction stories, especially when they’re indie and/or written by writers from underrepresented groups.
4. I don’t know what to say about it
Example: Emily Tesh’s Silver in the Wood
This doesn’t happen very often, but sometimes I have trouble specifying why I love a book so much. It could be that it reminds me of very specific childhood memories or that it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
Those reactions are a great deal of fun, but I need to have a firm list of reasons for enjoying a story before I decide to write a full review of it. I always want to be the sort of reviewer whose readers receive plenty of concrete examples of why I liked it so much so they can decide for themselves if it’s the right read for them.
Reviewing is serious business in my opinion!
131 Responses to Top Ten Tuesday: Books I Loved But Never Reviewed
Great list! It can be so frustrating when you sit down to write a review and realise you have no idea what to say about it, can’t it? I tend to find that with 3 star reads more than any other books.
Yes, it sure can be!
Your reasons for not reviewing certain books actually makes sense, especially for the ones that are aged (such as Frankenstein).
Here’s my Top Ten Tuesday post.
I’m glad you understand!
I also love The Martian and Frankenstein, and the latter is on my list for my TTT post this week, but because I read it before I had a blog to review it on! 😃
This post has given me such food for thought — I haven’t really thought about my own reasons for not reviewing a book.
I’m so glad to hear that. 🙂
Agree, agree, agree. However, I’d like to call you on your thoughts about Frankenstein. I think you are wrong that anyone who wants to read it has already read it. I read Frankenstein because I read a review that challenged my ideas about the book. I loved it.
Oh, that’s so cool! Maybe I should review it after all!
Very good reasons indeed! I always attempt to conjure up the feelings I experience when reading a book when I write a review, a particularly difficult task when I’m a bit indifferent to a novel!
Thank you. And exactly!
Oooh I know Frankenstein and totally understand that those people who want to read it have read it and will read it, irrespective
Great reasons for not reviewing! Eases up your to do list, too, I imagine 🙂
Heh, for sure.
I like your sorting them into categories. I never finished the Cave Bear series — I read the first…five, I think, and they’d become just a caveman soap opera, so I didn’t see a point in reading the last book in the series. I’m interested in your comment that your interpretation of scenes was different than the author’s — care to elaborate?
Thank you, Stephen!
I’ll try to answer your question without sharing too many spoilers. Basically, the first few books had a lot of foreshadowing about Ayla’s death, the growing cultural clash between The Clan and The Others, the idea that the two types of humans might find a peaceful way to resolve their differences and start trading, the fate of Ayla’s son, her relationship with her daughter, her use of that very dangerous root and how it could kill her if she tried it again, etc.
The final book totally ignored all of these conflicts. To make matters worse, it made Ayla and Jondalar in particular behave in ways they would have never behaved in any of the previous books. (Other folks in their lives behaved wildly out of character, too).
It was like a soap opera like you said. Very frustrating to me as a reader who thought there would be resolutions to all of the major conflicts.
I went back and read my ‘reviews’ of the series from thirteen years ago and I was VERY underwhelmed by the last book, in which nothing happened at all. I think I read reviews of the sixth book and got the impression it was more of the same. Thanks for the confirmation and follow-up info. I haven’t been tempted to go back to the series, but I sometimes wonder about the finale.
You’re quite welcome. 🙂
I like your reasoning and I agree, it’s difficult to write a review for a classic which is also why I stay away. I feel like I have nothing new to say!
Thank you! I’m glad you get it.
Your arguments carry a lot of weight here. It’s going to stick with me. Couldn’t agree more. Great Post!!
Thanks for stopping by my blog earlier, I will be doing a small post on The Art of racing in the rain tomorrow, will send you a link.
Have a great week!
Thank you! So glad to hear it, and I can’t wait to read that post.
These are all great reasons! I really like what you said about wanting to give readers concrete reasons for why you liked the book, so they can pick whether to add it to their TBR. That makes so much sense and I hadn’t really thought about it like that before!
Thank you very much. I’m glad it makes sense to you.
Love that you added your reasons for not reviewing a book and I can only say I agree completely. Most of the times when I don’t review a book, it’s because I just don’t know what to say, or because I feel like it’s already been reviewed a lot and I don’t have anything new to add.
I’m glad you understand!
Nice list! I love how you included reasons you haven’t reviewed the books you mentioned. I think classics would be tricky to review!
Great take on this week’s prompt! I can totally relate with loving a book so much that it becomes difficult to write a review for it because all you’ll do is gush about it and repeat yourself (or at least that’s how I usually get when I love a book wildly)! 😂
Heh, thanks! I’m glad you get it.
I really love how you approached this topic! I have to say I totally agree with you on all of these points. Also, I love, love, love Frankenstein. One of my all time favorite books!!
So glad to hear that! Thanks. And, yeah, Frankenstein only gets better with every reread.
Those are good books. https://pmprescott.blogspot.com/2020/08/ttt-081120.html
Thank you! I think we commented on each other’s sites at almost the exact same time. Haha.
This is a neat twist on this topic, and I totally agree with every single one, haha
Thank you very much!
I love your selection and the reasons you have cited. This resonated, too: “This doesn’t happen very often, but sometimes I have trouble specifying why I love a book so much.”
I’m glad/sorry that you understand that so well. It’s frustrating, huh?!
Good reasons. I don’t generally review my series books like No 1 Ladies Detective Agency–you have to read them to understand what I’d say and it’s too hard to avoid spoilers. I have also struggled on classics.
That makes total sense to me.
I love your reasoning! And I know what you mean about reviewing books that are already getting all the love. I also would usually rather talk about books that people don’t know about. (Sometimes, though, I’ve been talking so much about how I’m anticipating a hyped book that I feel I have to review it.)
I hope you have a great time reviewing that hyped book! It’s such a great feeling to finally read something you’re super excited about. 🙂 And thank you for your kind words.
A great list of reasons, Lydia! Come to think of it, I don’t think I’ve ever reviewed a classic either.
Thank you! At least I’m not alone there.
I can relate to sometimes not knowing what to say. I know I love it but sometimes I just can’t effectively communicate why.
You’re definitely not alone there!
I have a problem reviewing classics too. I tend to think it is a good thing to review them in order to draw attention to classic pieces of literature. But I don’t feel like I can read a book that influenced society and modern literature and rate it in the same way I rate the latest rom-com or thriller.
Great list! Mostly the ones I haven’t reviewed are just the ones I read before I started blogging.
Thank you very much. And, yeah, rating is another issue.
Great list! This makes a lot of sense to me. I don’t always review older books either, because they’ve been established for a while already. I like to focus on newer books. Also your fourth point is why I very rarely am able to review solid 5 star reads. I don’t know what to say except for “this was amazing!”
I hear you there!
I don’t review classics for the same reason. There’s nothing I can say that hasn’t already been said about them.
Great idea! I agree with a lot of your points, I find it hard to review books that are really ‘mainstream’ or popular, and ones that are old! Theres something about old or popular books that makes it really difficult for me to articulate how I’m feeling.
Yes, that’s how I feel, too. You’re not alone. 🙂
Fab reasons for not reviewing!
Those are all good reasons for not reviewing a book! 🙂
So glad you think so!
I always review books I’ve read! Sometimes it’s just a couple of sentences, sometimes it’s multiple paragraphs.
These are all good reasons. Sometimes writing a review can be difficult.
Thank you very much.
Great idea of sharing the reasons why you don’t write reviews of certain books you loved.
Here is my Top Ten Tuesday list this week.
I would really love to see a movie that does Frankenstein justice one of these days. 🙂
My fingers are crossed that will eventually happen!
I really get what you mean when you can’t really explain why loved a book. It can be so frustrating because you want to share it with the world but really, your only argument is ‘it’s sooo good’!
I totally agree with not reviewing the classics, everyone knows Frankenstein, I can’t believe it’s 202 years old!
I know, right? It has such staying power.
I completely understand your reasons. I struggle with reviewing books with surprising endings – I try to keep my reviews as vague as possible. And reviewing classics is pretty hard, especially when I didn’t love it.
I’m glad you get it. 🙂
Great list! I think it’s really interesting to see your different reasons why you don’t review certain books! I don’t think I have such defined reasons, I just usually don’t get to it quickly enough and the book ends up a little blurry in my mind!
That makes total sense.
I read more books than I write about, too. And I find it specially hard to write about the books I love the most. I saw the film The Martian, but it was´t my cup of tea. Mary Shelly´s Frankenstein is much more interesting
I’m glad you liked Frankenstein!
I love what you did with this topic! It was so fun to read your different reasons why you didn’t review with examples. If I did this, I would include it was too good. Some good books are harder for me to review.
Thank you very much.
And, yeah, books that are too good can be trickier to review.
Yeah I totally get what you mean. If I read a popular book and I see that it’s been talked and advertised about to the point of saturation I tend to not write about it and would rather reserve it to lesser known books or hidden gems.
Huh, interesting that you’re selective about what to review! I review everything and never really thought about doing anything else…
I’m fascinated by that!
These are great points. I’ve actually had similar reasons when trying to write reviews. I really have been struggling lately! It’s so hard to write a great review for a book I love. I just feel like I can’t do it justice!
At least we’re not alone. 🙂
This is a great post and topic Lydia. I found myself nodding along to all the reasons you gave.
Aww, thanks. So glad you liked it.
Your thoughts on the Clan of the Cave Bear series have me really intrigued. That’s a series I’ve always been interested in. Now I’m more curious than ever!
Will you be giving it a try? The first few books in it are really good. I think you’d enjoy them based on what you’ve shared about your reading preferences in general.
I am seriously considering it. It does seem ike something I’d like!
Great list! Also, thank you sooooo much for letting me know about my link. I just updated it in the link section and let Jana know in the comments that she could delete my response if she wanted since first one was weird. I appreciate it! WordPress was giving me issues today about posting originally.
It is hard coming up with reviews for some books when they are so great but just do’t have much to say.
You’re very welcome. I’m glad you got it sorted out.
Those are all great reasons for not writing reviews. I tend not to write reviews for classics — I mean, really, I’m not a literary expert, and I’m sure anything to be said about these books has already been said.
Thank you very much! And agreed.
This makes sense to me! I wish my reasons for not reviewing books I loved were so rational. Usually, I have every intention of writing a great review that will persuade other readers to try the book, but then I pick up the next book, start reading, and…poof! There go all my good intentions!
Thanks a lot. And no worries. Not every reason will be easy to describe.
I totally understand when you just feel like there’s nothing more to say about a book, in particular classics. I read Frankenstein several years ago and loved it but I just felt like who doesn’t know the story, right? Great TTT list.
Thanks a lot!
I’ve found a lot of people saying they don’t review the classics. I find that very interesting. I understand, to a certain extent, most of the reasons. But still more people feel this way than I would have thought.
I’m surprised by that, too! I’d think they’d be a popular choice for reviews since they’re so well known.
This is such an interesting take on this prompt! I know what you mean about not writing reviews for series with unexpected endings! My main one is not reviewing books with endings that catch me off guard because I feel the need to take time and process the story before writing, but then it takes too long!
That makes total sense. And thank you.
I love where you went with this. Yes on the classics. I also have difficulties pinning down reviews on books that are really well written but I just can’t “like.” The Golden Child is an example.
Aww, thanks. Glad you liked it.
#2 and #4 are my big ones. I haven’t gone back to review the classics I read in school. For more recent reads, sometimes I don’t know what to say about a book except that it’s amazing and I loved it.
I hear you there!
I’m curious since you said you only review some books you read. What would you approximate as the proportion of books you actually review? I don’t think I’ve had problems with the first point, but the others have definitely applied to my blogging as well. Sometimes writing a review is hard and it’s much better to skip the review and just let people know you loved the book.
Good question! I’d guess I write reviews for about 20% of them? So many of the books I read don’t fit the theme of this blog.
Great list 👌👌 I loved reading your post 💕
Thanks for sharing
Thank you very much.
I can definitely relate to your reasons for not writing reviews. I rarely review a book in a series unless its the first book, or I got it as an ARC. It’s just too hard to write about without giving too much away. I also think if a book is really popular and well known, there’s less point in reviewing it.
I’m glad you get it.
Ooh, I like this take on the prompt. It’s interesting to see WHY you don’t review a book. I don’t review books for similar reasons as well as if it’s an older book. To me, review is to convince someone to read it or not and if it’s more than like two years old, they’ve probably already read enough reviews to make that decision.
Aww, thanks! And I hear you there.
Thanks for the visit! You’ve created a lively discussion here, which is one of the reasons I enjoy book sites so much. I agree with your thoughts, especially the “I don’t have much to say”. I enjoy reading mysteries and sometimes there’s just not much to say except “that was well written and cool” which isn’t very helpful. 🙂
However, I don’t read the volume that many book bloggers do, so I do try to review most of what I read, even if it’s just a little mini review.
You’re quite welcome. I think it’s wonderful that you review most of what you read.
I’m a bit embarrassed to say I haven’t read Frankenstein. I am determined to do it, though. Maybe this fall?? 🙂
I hope you’ll give it a shot. It’s the perfect autumn/Halloween read.
This is a great list, I have a hard time writing about books I really loved as a child, words just don’t come to me…
Thank you very much. Yeah, that’s tricky.
“I don’t know what to say about it” is probably the number one reason why I don’t review certain books. Sometimes I either have nothing to say even though it was a great read or I just can’t really find adequate words to convey why I loved it so much.
I’m glad I’m not alone there!
I love your spin on this topic! I have to say I identify with your #4 reason a lot. When I used to try to review every book I read, I found myself repeating a lot of phrases and ideas and decided I didn’t want to review something unless there was something I really needed to say about it and sometimes I just don’t know what that is.
This is a cool list. I wouldn’t have considered some of these reasons for not reviewing.
I agree with making many lists on this topic alone! There are so many books I’ve skipped reviewing for so many different reasons!
Thanks so much for stopping by my TTT!
Stacy Renee @ Lazy Day Lit
I love your take on this prompt!
I totally get your reasons for not reviewing certain books, especially #2 and #3.
Before I finally found my blogging nische I reviewed a nonqueer retelling of Beauty and the Beast but aside from it being really, really horrible? It’s not like people don’t know about the story.
I love that you gave the reasons why you chose not to review them! I find it hard to review classics or overly hyped mainstream books that have been out for a while, because I generally don’t feel that my review will make a difference and I don’t think I can say anything that hasn’t been said yet. I should be reviewing Silver in the Wood soon, and I have no idea how the heck I’m going to review it, either haha. Sometimes it’s a challenge!
Interesting take on the topic. I totally understand your take. I have read and reviewed two of the books you mentioned (Frankenstein, The Martian) but I do that mainly for myself anyway, so if someone has read a hundred reviews of them, they can easily skip it. Also, I still like reviews of books by people where I know they have a similar taste than I do.
But I loved your post, it’s so lovely to see other thoughts on the subject.
Thanks for visiting my TTT earlier.